Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25641 - 25650 of 65135 for or b.
Search results 25641 - 25650 of 65135 for or b.
State v. John W. Moore
County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. DYKMAN, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. DYKMAN, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
)(b), as well as the citation for OMVWI. No. 01-0595 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
)(b), as well as the citation for OMVWI. No. 01-0595 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2008AP757 2 Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36486 - 2014-09-15
County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2008AP757 2 Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36486 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Pamela P.
parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6767 - 2017-09-20
parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6767 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. This opinion may not be cited under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190420 - 2017-09-21
This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. This opinion may not be cited under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190420 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the vehicle: [B]ecause the way they were talking and telling me their story they – it wasn’t matching. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44583 - 2009-12-14
the vehicle: [B]ecause the way they were talking and telling me their story they – it wasn’t matching. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44583 - 2009-12-14
[PDF]
State v. David William Newbury
.” Accordingly, we reject Newbury's request for resentencing. No. 95-0625-CR -6- B. Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19
.” Accordingly, we reject Newbury's request for resentencing. No. 95-0625-CR -6- B. Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul S. Matyasz
now. B. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL ¶9 Matyasz claims that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6146 - 2005-03-31
now. B. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL ¶9 Matyasz claims that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6146 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
” within the statutory definition of hearsay. “A ‘statement’ is (a) an oral or written assertion or (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106333 - 2014-01-06
” within the statutory definition of hearsay. “A ‘statement’ is (a) an oral or written assertion or (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106333 - 2014-01-06
State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
determined that Jasper’s lawyer provided effective assistance. B. New Factor/Sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
determined that Jasper’s lawyer provided effective assistance. B. New Factor/Sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31