Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 62739 for child support.

[PDF] Affidavit of Douglas M. Poland (Lamar PHV Motion)
Case 2021AP001450 Affidavit of Douglas M. Poland in Support of Motion for ...Filed 09-20-2021 Page
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/affidavitpolandlamarphvmotion.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 20-08 - Comments from Attorney Korey C. Lundin, Deedee Peterson and Attorney
half of Wisconsin. We write for two reasons: 1) to support the Petition’s recommendation to retain
/supreme/docs/2008commentslundin.pdf - 2021-03-01

[PDF] NOTICE
the breach. He also argues that the trial court’s findings support his contention that, in fact, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29397 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 42
in the record supports LIRC’s conclusion that Nuetzel’s prior work injuries require permanent work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Jackson argues that the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant did not establish probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842142 - 2024-08-27

[PDF] State v. Alfredo Vega
assistance of trial counsel; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his No. 95-2895-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9845 - 2017-09-19

Tony Schroeckenthaler v. Roger Philbrick
independently search the record to determine whether additional reasons exist to support the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to support each of Whittington’s convictions. We note that the guilty verdicts against Whittington were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468095 - 2021-12-30

[PDF] NOTICE
discretionary decision, not for evidence to support findings the court could have made but did not. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34522 - 2014-09-15

State v. Alfredo Vega
to support his conviction; and (3) whether the trial court failed to consider evidence “which negated intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31