Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 61737 for does.

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
is a probationary promotee. Just as a period of probation may reveal the new recruit who does not possess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Patricia H.
does not require clear and convincing evidence of unfitness. The County fails to respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4623 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. This allocation of the burden of proof does not, however, provide Smiley any grounds for relief. Smiley took
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250788 - 2019-11-26

[PDF] Winnebago County Health and Human Services v. Bridget D.
hearing; it does not address the situation here where a new judge is assigned to the matter after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6309 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. ¶10 “A motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175966 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
. DISCUSSION Przybilla raises three issues. In the first, he asserts: "The Constitution does not permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9172 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
does not allege sufficient facts, if the motion contains only conclusory allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91094 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
found on Kakwitch’s person. Kakwitch does not renew this ground for dismissal on appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239898 - 2019-04-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Sec. 102.23(6). ¶18 Although LIRC’s findings of fact are conclusive, a reviewing court does have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63754 - 2014-09-15

Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
acres” for $61,000. This writing provided that it “[was] not binding if Don (Vodak) does not purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31