Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 57152 for id.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 57152 for id.
State v. Donald Savinski
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11524 - 2005-03-31
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11524 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We will not upset the trial court’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We will not upset the trial court’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and will uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. We then “review the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
, and will uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. We then “review the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
Katherine H. Leete v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
sport, game or educational activity.” See id. This definition is broadly worded, evincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16250 - 2017-09-21
sport, game or educational activity.” See id. This definition is broadly worded, evincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
formation apply and yet formality is not essential. Id. “[T]he relationship may be implied from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
formation apply and yet formality is not essential. Id. “[T]he relationship may be implied from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circuit court’s comments for each defendant. See id. ¶3 Initially, we note that Goodman and Staten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28683 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s comments for each defendant. See id. ¶3 Initially, we note that Goodman and Staten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28683 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not justify a discretionary reversal.” See id., ¶20. Lewis’s postconviction/appellate counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
not justify a discretionary reversal.” See id., ¶20. Lewis’s postconviction/appellate counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of a defendant’s conduct are probative.” Id., ¶38; see also State v. Maker, 48 Wis. 2d 612, 616-19, 180 N.W.2d 707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55391 - 2010-10-12
of a defendant’s conduct are probative.” Id., ¶38; see also State v. Maker, 48 Wis. 2d 612, 616-19, 180 N.W.2d 707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55391 - 2010-10-12
State v. Jeffrey L. Conners
factors.” See id. at 355 (citations omitted). The primary factors for the sentencing court to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20799 - 2005-12-27
factors.” See id. at 355 (citations omitted). The primary factors for the sentencing court to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20799 - 2005-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
professional judgment. Id. at 690. However, “every effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
professional judgment. Id. at 690. However, “every effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08