Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
CA Blank Order
, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). There is no arguable merit to a claim that there was no factual basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131327 - 2014-12-08
, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). There is no arguable merit to a claim that there was no factual basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131327 - 2014-12-08
Mark Terpstra v. Joseph Van Aelstyn
the court’s determination that they failed to prove a misrepresentation claim against Joseph and Cornelia Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7667 - 2005-03-31
the court’s determination that they failed to prove a misrepresentation claim against Joseph and Cornelia Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7667 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the allegations against Mr. Sparks. ¶8 The State countered that Sparks was claiming only “that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
the allegations against Mr. Sparks. ¶8 The State countered that Sparks was claiming only “that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
[PDF]
State v. James L. Johnson
for sentence modification purposes, and No. 2004AP921-CR 2 that Johnson’s remaining claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21363 - 2017-09-21
for sentence modification purposes, and No. 2004AP921-CR 2 that Johnson’s remaining claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21363 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Guy R. Willett
against double jeopardy. The sentence originally imposed was a valid sentence Willett claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16103 - 2017-09-21
against double jeopardy. The sentence originally imposed was a valid sentence Willett claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16103 - 2017-09-21
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95260 - 2013-04-07
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95260 - 2013-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
her sentence. She claimed the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20
her sentence. She claimed the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for Madison’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We therefore reverse the order denying Madison’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208200 - 2018-02-06
for Madison’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We therefore reverse the order denying Madison’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208200 - 2018-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when the movant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110153 - 2017-09-21
when the movant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110153 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
issues on appeal, most of which are wholly undeveloped and are based on factual claims that are refuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38453 - 2014-09-15
issues on appeal, most of which are wholly undeveloped and are based on factual claims that are refuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38453 - 2014-09-15