Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 25651 - 25660 of 83387 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In Milwaukee County Case No. 2013CF1305, Holland was convicted of burglary and aggravated battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214238 - 2018-06-14
. In Milwaukee County Case No. 2013CF1305, Holland was convicted of burglary and aggravated battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214238 - 2018-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543063 - 2022-07-13
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543063 - 2022-07-13
Anne C. Hepperla v. John D. Puchner
2001 WI App 50 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14847 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 50 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14847 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898488 - 2025-01-09
support. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898488 - 2025-01-09
Monika Gasper v. Andrew and Nancy Parbs
2001 WI App 259 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-2476 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3018 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 259 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-2476 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3018 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
, the cases were scheduled for a jury trial on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3921 - 2005-03-31
, the cases were scheduled for a jury trial on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3921 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and the case was remanded to the Michigan circuit court for entry of an order dismissing the action. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2015-05-26
and the case was remanded to the Michigan circuit court for entry of an order dismissing the action. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2015-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was unconstitutional, and “an order vacating the judgment entered [in the 2013 tax foreclosure case].” The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216067 - 2018-07-24
was unconstitutional, and “an order vacating the judgment entered [in the 2013 tax foreclosure case].” The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216067 - 2018-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. We therefore reverse and remand for the court to reconsider whether to reopen the case. In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94205 - 2013-03-18
. We therefore reverse and remand for the court to reconsider whether to reopen the case. In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94205 - 2013-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Appeals, the judgment was vacated and the case was remanded to the Michigan circuit court for entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142170 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals, the judgment was vacated and the case was remanded to the Michigan circuit court for entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142170 - 2017-09-21