Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 29985 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Albert J. Price, Jr.
to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. at 719 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3319 - 2017-09-19
to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. at 719 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3319 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Amy B. Reardon v. David O. Braeger
ruling merits de novo review because it requires applying undisputed facts to a statute. In other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25508 - 2017-09-21
ruling merits de novo review because it requires applying undisputed facts to a statute. In other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is de novo, and we are not bound by the circuit court’s reasoning. Mrozek v. Intra Fin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649123 - 2023-04-27
judgment decision is de novo, and we are not bound by the circuit court’s reasoning. Mrozek v. Intra Fin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649123 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State breached the plea agreement, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
the State breached the plea agreement, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard of dangerousness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See D.J.W., 391
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590139 - 2022-11-16
the statutory standard of dangerousness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See D.J.W., 391
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590139 - 2022-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict in a criminal prosecution is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659795 - 2023-05-23
is sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict in a criminal prosecution is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659795 - 2023-05-23
2009 WI APP 105
principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶9 On appeal, the parties concede that the arrest warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36809 - 2009-07-28
principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶9 On appeal, the parties concede that the arrest warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36809 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the preliminary hearing was used as a de facto evidence deposition for the State, which was improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56204 - 2014-09-15
, the preliminary hearing was used as a de facto evidence deposition for the State, which was improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 78
in the complaint[]. These are questions of law we review de novo. Marks v. Houston Cas. Co., 2015 WI App 44, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148908 - 2017-09-21
in the complaint[]. These are questions of law we review de novo. Marks v. Houston Cas. Co., 2015 WI App 44, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148908 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law we review de novo. Id. “Counsel’s conduct is constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30
a question of law we review de novo. Id. “Counsel’s conduct is constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30