Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 29821 for des.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 29821 for des.
Irene Blumer v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
with federal law. Accordingly, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review is de novo. Overview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15414 - 2005-03-31
with federal law. Accordingly, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review is de novo. Overview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 If a court finds that one prong of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795210 - 2024-05-01
are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 If a court finds that one prong of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795210 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8414 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8414 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20923 - 2017-09-21
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20923 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Equity Enterprises, Inc. v. Robert J. Milosch
is a question of law reviewed de novo. RTE Corp. v. Md. Cas. Co., 74 Wis. 2d 614, 621, 247 N.W.2d 171 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3158 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law reviewed de novo. RTE Corp. v. Md. Cas. Co., 74 Wis. 2d 614, 621, 247 N.W.2d 171 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3158 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the statute to the facts of record, presenting a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Penzkofer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32451 - 2014-09-15
the statute to the facts of record, presenting a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Penzkofer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32451 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Debra L. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d Nos. 03-2177 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6768 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d Nos. 03-2177 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6768 - 2017-09-20
State v. DeWayne E. Goodwin
de novo.” Id. The Reynolds court outlined the test used to analyze claims of multiplicity: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15334 - 2005-03-31
de novo.” Id. The Reynolds court outlined the test used to analyze claims of multiplicity: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Eason, 245 Wis. 2d 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Eason, 245 Wis. 2d 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21