Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 57346 for id.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 57346 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
incarceration does not, in itself, demonstrate that the individual is an unfit parent.” Id., ¶49. Likewise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
incarceration does not, in itself, demonstrate that the individual is an unfit parent.” Id., ¶49. Likewise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutes double jeopardy.” Id. at 3. We rejected that challenge and affirmed. See id. at 6. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44849 - 2014-09-15
constitutes double jeopardy.” Id. at 3. We rejected that challenge and affirmed. See id. at 6. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nadaniel P. Jones
, all of the occupants of that vehicle have standing to challenge the seizure. Id. at 257. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
, all of the occupants of that vehicle have standing to challenge the seizure. Id. at 257. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 111
a person pasturing animals “shall have a lien thereon and may retain the possession thereof ….” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52646 - 2010-08-24
a person pasturing animals “shall have a lien thereon and may retain the possession thereof ….” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52646 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
“on the basis of clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. “When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
“on the basis of clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. “When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Stank
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
showing on either one. See id. at 697. A hearing is required only if the defendant alleges facts which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96744 - 2014-09-15
showing on either one. See id. at 697. A hearing is required only if the defendant alleges facts which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96744 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s comments for each defendant. See id. ¶3 Initially, we note that Goodman and Staten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
the circuit court’s comments for each defendant. See id. ¶3 Initially, we note that Goodman and Staten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
State v. James Ward
by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
then shifts to the [S]tate to prove the error was harmless. Id., ¶26 (citations omitted). ¶4 Zelaya
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28155 - 2007-02-20
then shifts to the [S]tate to prove the error was harmless. Id., ¶26 (citations omitted). ¶4 Zelaya
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28155 - 2007-02-20