Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 33351 for ii.

[PDF] Comments on Supreme Court rule 17-01 - The Campaign Legal Center
II. Wisconsin’s recent history underscores the importance of amending the state’s recusal rules
/supreme/docs/1701commentsfischer.pdf - 2017-03-15

[PDF] 23-01 - Signed Memorandum in Support of Petition
on appeal. II. RECENT CHALLENGES PRESENTED BY THE STANDARD OF REVIEW Several cases over the past few
/supreme/docs/2301memo.pdf - 2023-01-24

[PDF] Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Lisa Hunter et al.)
to redistrict a state. II. Only the Governor’s and the Hunter Intervenors’ congressional maps comply
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrctohunter.pdf - 2022-01-05

[PDF] The facts on marijuana
). Behind bars II: Substance abuse and America’s prison population. New York: Columbia University
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/factsmarijuana.pdf - 2021-09-23

[PDF] Drug court practitioner fact sheet -- Family dependency treatment court: Applying the drug court model in child maltreatment cases
: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving courts in the United States (Volume II, No. 1
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/fdtcfactsheet.pdf - 2021-09-29

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2020
of a decision of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II (headquartered in Waukesha), that affirmed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286649 - 2020-09-08

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - November 2012
) This is a review of a decision of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II (headquartered in Waukesha), which
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88944 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Joseph D. Haas
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15955 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the issues for the circuit court at the bench trial. II. Ineffective assistance of counsel ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968203 - 2025-06-10

COURT OF APPEALS
that trial counsel was ineffective. II. Hare’s postconviction motion failed to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117781 - 2014-07-28