Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25661 - 25670 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a “new factor” claim. See State v. Klubertanz, 2006 WI App 71, ¶35, 291 Wis. 2d 751, 713 N.W.2d 116
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157901 - 2017-09-21
as a “new factor” claim. See State v. Klubertanz, 2006 WI App 71, ¶35, 291 Wis. 2d 751, 713 N.W.2d 116
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157901 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon. He claims the trial court should have granted his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29887 - 2007-08-01
weapon. He claims the trial court should have granted his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29887 - 2007-08-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and required the court to set a parole eligibility date, this claim does not assert a new factor but instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30
and required the court to set a parole eligibility date, this claim does not assert a new factor but instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals, and writs. We have repeatedly denied his claims. See Harris v. State (Harris I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191269 - 2017-09-21
, appeals, and writs. We have repeatedly denied his claims. See Harris v. State (Harris I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Moses Sean P.
to consider otherwise, we do not understand Moses to claim that the statements he made to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8981 - 2017-09-19
to consider otherwise, we do not understand Moses to claim that the statements he made to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8981 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when the movant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110153 - 2017-09-21
when the movant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110153 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶18. The State appealed. On appeal the court wrote: While the jury rejected Miller’s claim of self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62366 - 2011-04-05
., ¶18. The State appealed. On appeal the court wrote: While the jury rejected Miller’s claim of self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62366 - 2011-04-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
claimed the bulk of the responsibility for the prank. The Commission amended its findings but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35879 - 2014-09-15
claimed the bulk of the responsibility for the prank. The Commission amended its findings but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35879 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy J. Lee
possessing marijuana contrary to §§ 161.14(4)(t) and 161.01(14), Stats. Lee claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-03-31
possessing marijuana contrary to §§ 161.14(4)(t) and 161.01(14), Stats. Lee claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the allegations against Mr. Sparks. ¶8 The State countered that Sparks was claiming only “that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
the allegations against Mr. Sparks. ¶8 The State countered that Sparks was claiming only “that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28