Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25671 - 25680 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.

Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
and Leila Bailie (collectively “the Scotts”) appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14427 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of his trial and appellate[2] counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92235 - 2013-01-28

COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Ezra O. Sanders, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46729 - 2010-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 2, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Glen Hong appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26989 - 2006-11-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an order1 denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92235 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
B. Campbell, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53053 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
se from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140608 - 2015-04-28

[PDF] State v. Pastor Ramirez
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues relate to plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26145 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
Bailie (collectively “the Scotts”) appeal from an order denying their motion for a new No(s). 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14427 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert K. Rymer
erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel without holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15624 - 2005-03-31