Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25671 - 25680 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25671 - 25680 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). I review de novo whether those facts satisfy the constitutional standard for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118622 - 2014-07-30
omitted). I review de novo whether those facts satisfy the constitutional standard for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118622 - 2014-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. A. Summary Judgment ¶15 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79061 - 2012-03-05
. A. Summary Judgment ¶15 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79061 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320556 - 2021-01-05
we review de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320556 - 2021-01-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts satisfy the statutory standards, however, is a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766422 - 2024-02-21
facts satisfy the statutory standards, however, is a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766422 - 2024-02-21
[PDF]
WI App 57
returns of service admissible as public records. See United States v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399168 - 2021-09-08
returns of service admissible as public records. See United States v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399168 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16000 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16000 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
885, 891. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
885, 891. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
thought process based on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71741 - 2014-09-15
thought process based on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71741 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
proportional representation is not required.” Id. There is no “de minimus disparity [that] amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239586 - 2019-10-01
proportional representation is not required.” Id. There is no “de minimus disparity [that] amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239586 - 2019-10-01