Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25671 - 25680 of 69002 for had.

State v. Gary Cembrowski
alleged that three of the vehicle's tires had been slashed. On May 22, 1996, pursuant to plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2009-08-03

Sandra L. Pauloski v. Stephen J. Pauloski
. The commissioner recognized that even though Stephen had a child support obligation, it would be unfair to require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5874 - 2005-03-31

Aiken & Scoptur v. John Brendel
by considering it significant that Brendel had never met the client and had not expended any time on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4314 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
the postconviction motion without a hearing. In its decision, the court noted that Eberhardt had testified on voir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28074 - 2007-02-13

[PDF] State v. Mark Kelnhofer
issue with DeJarlais's right to detain the vehicle and its occupants after he had observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8942 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dale W. Repinski
to the presentence investigation and Repinski's counsel requested a copy of the addendum because he had not seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10182 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Senecal
. Senecal requested and received an adjournment because his counsel had only recently been retained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3413 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
vice president and treasurer. The brothers-in-law also had a real estate partnership. The real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158292 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
was rescheduled and finally took place on November 13. At this hearing, Snyder’s attorney noted that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30618 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an answer, preserving the issue of jurisdiction. On June 23, 2015, Austin had the sheriff’s office
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21