Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25681 - 25690 of 46708 for adult name change.

[PDF] Julaine M. Kinnard v. Peter R. Kinziger
of some change of circumstances and that’s just the nature of this case, which is the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3687 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
, the conditions for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially. On September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12591 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cornell Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
immediate amendment of WIS. ADM. CODE ch. DOC 310, which governs the ICRS. The changes became effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13732 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of a “sexually violent person” was changed to mean someone who is “likely,” rather than “substantially probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29707 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
of medications Lopez was taking; to present testimony from a doctor with whom Olivas had discussed changes in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101416 - 2013-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[.] The court also reasoned that D.K.’s mention of Triolo assaulting R. would not have changed the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
hearing more about Jonathan’s preference that the child care costs be reduced or eliminated by changes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92689 - 2014-09-15

State v. Shannan M. Nipple
evidence would change the outcome. Therefore, we reverse Shannan’s convictions and remand to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Taylor County Human Services Department v. Christine A.J.
substantially changes the type of conduct that may lead to the loss of rights without notice to the parent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10754 - 2017-09-20

La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12591 - 2005-03-31