Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25681 - 25690 of 51893 for him.
Search results 25681 - 25690 of 51893 for him.
State v. Keith S. Betts
of conviction entered after a jury convicted him of armed robbery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(1)(a) and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
of conviction entered after a jury convicted him of armed robbery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(1)(a) and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carrie K. Elmer
was on probation for a felony conviction, but the circuit court refused to permit him to testify that the friend’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31
was on probation for a felony conviction, but the circuit court refused to permit him to testify that the friend’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he was denied his right to cross-examine the testimony against him under the Confrontation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366763 - 2021-05-13
argues that he was denied his right to cross-examine the testimony against him under the Confrontation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366763 - 2021-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
suggests that the sentencing court was unaware of the letter’s existence when it sentenced him in 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31017 - 2007-12-04
suggests that the sentencing court was unaware of the letter’s existence when it sentenced him in 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31017 - 2007-12-04
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
and intelligently entered; (2) the circuit court did not properly notify him of his right to substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3425 - 2017-09-19
and intelligently entered; (2) the circuit court did not properly notify him of his right to substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3425 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
and intelligently entered; (2) the circuit court did not properly notify him of his right to substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3426 - 2017-09-19
and intelligently entered; (2) the circuit court did not properly notify him of his right to substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3426 - 2017-09-19
State v. Deryl B. Beyer
appeals from a judgment committing him to a secure mental health facility after a jury found that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2110 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment committing him to a secure mental health facility after a jury found that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2110 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
stated he brought the two promotional mailings with him and that Anderson assured him the vacant lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81647 - 2012-04-30
stated he brought the two promotional mailings with him and that Anderson assured him the vacant lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81647 - 2012-04-30
William Schleichert v. Columbia County
and wrote to Hesslink, telling him that he (Olson) would try to get some settlement figures to him by early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9390 - 2005-03-31
and wrote to Hesslink, telling him that he (Olson) would try to get some settlement figures to him by early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9390 - 2005-03-31
Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
of real estate for which his aunt had granted him an option to purchase. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31
of real estate for which his aunt had granted him an option to purchase. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31