Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25691 - 25700 of 30059 for de.

Howard M. v. Jean R.
] and reviewing the legal issues de novo. DOR v. Exxon Corp., 90 Wis.2d 700, 713, 281 N.W.2d 94, 101 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7832 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
2009, when Atlantic requested additional information concerning certain invoices and De Marco’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106012 - 2013-12-26

[PDF] Daniel P. Gaugert v. Howard E. Duve
review de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ANALYSIS ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14660 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26

[PDF] State v. James F. Karls
of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See State v. No. 98-0695 7 Cummings, 199 Wis.2d 721
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Terry L. Jordan
reviewed de novo by this court. See id. ¶10 “A litigant is denied due process only if the judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6727 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 34
orders present issues of law, which we review de novo and without deference to the interpretations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538815 - 2022-08-10

[PDF] State v. Gregory A. Busch
interpretation is one which we review de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17162 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472367 - 2022-01-13