Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 30059 for de.
Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph Scott
we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13488 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vernon D. Fields
of law which we review de novo. State v. Campbell, 201 Wis. 2d 783, 788, 549 N.W.2d 501 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3916 - 2017-09-20
of law which we review de novo. State v. Campbell, 201 Wis. 2d 783, 788, 549 N.W.2d 501 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3916 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the right to be free from double jeopardy,” which are questions of law we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
the right to be free from double jeopardy,” which are questions of law we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest that was unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110871 - 2014-04-23
of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest that was unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110871 - 2014-04-23
[PDF]
Alisa Zehetner v. Chrysler Financial Company, LLC
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6548 - 2017-09-19
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6548 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
John Bettendorf v. St. Croix County
court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo. Town of Baraboo v. Village of West Baraboo, 2005 WI App 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26294 - 2017-09-21
court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo. Town of Baraboo v. Village of West Baraboo, 2005 WI App 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26294 - 2017-09-21
Michael J. Schultz v. Village of Stoddard
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24564 - 2006-03-22
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24564 - 2006-03-22