Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 29966 for de.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 29966 for de.
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v. Village of Hartland
apply de novo the standards set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.08. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4860 - 2017-09-19
apply de novo the standards set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.08. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4860 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
counted as a marital asset. He acknowledges that the value of the television is de minimus. He simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30794 - 2014-09-15
counted as a marital asset. He acknowledges that the value of the television is de minimus. He simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Harnischfeger Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
is that statutory interpretation is a question of law which courts decide de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16858 - 2017-09-21
is that statutory interpretation is a question of law which courts decide de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16858 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willy J. Love
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16164 - 2017-09-21
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Randy J. Ravenscroft v. Diane M. Ravenscroft
in computing Randy’s arrearages presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Douglas County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13398 - 2017-09-21
in computing Randy’s arrearages presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Douglas County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 54
judgment de novo, using the same methodology of the circuit court. Phillips v. Parmelee, 2013 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109697 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, using the same methodology of the circuit court. Phillips v. Parmelee, 2013 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109697 - 2017-09-21
Michael J. Schultz v. Village of Stoddard
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24564 - 2006-03-22
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24564 - 2006-03-22