Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 29823 for des.
Jack Gasparac v. Mae Schunk
We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4869 - 2005-03-31
We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4869 - 2005-03-31
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barry R. Drews
concentration in a driver’s body is reasonable is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15933 - 2017-09-21
concentration in a driver’s body is reasonable is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277. However, this court reviews de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257975 - 2020-04-16
48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277. However, this court reviews de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257975 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randolph Scott
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
May a judge or the judge's staff attend a holiday party given by a law firm some of whose members appear before the judge?
staff accept gifts of candy or food from attorneys? ANSWER Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887 - 2017-09-20
staff accept gifts of candy or food from attorneys? ANSWER Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and Women's Club of De Pere, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Janette Johnson, Involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35430 - 2009-02-02
and Women's Club of De Pere, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Janette Johnson, Involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35430 - 2009-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest that was unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110871 - 2014-04-23
of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest that was unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110871 - 2014-04-23
[PDF]
Courtney Nunez v. American Family Mutual Insurance
. § 346.922 applies to the facts of this case presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5173 - 2017-09-19
. § 346.922 applies to the facts of this case presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5173 - 2017-09-19