Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 68502 for did.

State v. Warren J. Pik
court did not address Pik's medical condition. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8991 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terrance L. Meloy, Jr.
are in his favor. The court did note that fifth offense is a felony, “represents a significant societal ill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6425 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard J. Schleife v. Marquip, Inc.
commenced October 14, 1991, and that Schleife did not waive his right to back wages between that date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8709 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Glen Proeber, Jr.
. Proeber appeals. Proeber asserts that the trial court erred because Wanie did not “substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10060 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
which the crime was committed. We agree with the circuit court that Goad did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127901 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
motion seeking to withdraw his plea. The ground was that the circuit court did not comply with duties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26783 - 2006-10-11

State v. Glen Proeber, Jr.
because Wanie did not “substantially comply” with § 343.305(4m), Stats. Since Proeber did not actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10060 - 2008-03-31

[PDF] WI App 29
at the end of the traffic stop—did not unreasonably extend the stop under the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357950 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Trewin
with his secured creditors. D.S. did not have the money to pay the $400 fee to convert the bankruptcy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16700 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unfairly prejudice CarlsonSV.2 ¶3 We conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680465 - 2023-07-18