Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 76923 for judgment for u s.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 76923 for judgment for u s.
2006 WI APP 210
-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: francis t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26418 - 2006-10-30
-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: francis t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26418 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 210
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FRANCIS T. WASIELEWSKI, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FRANCIS T. WASIELEWSKI, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 225
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: JOHN W. ROETHE, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26781 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: JOHN W. ROETHE, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26781 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 225
a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: John w. Roethe, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26781 - 2006-11-20
a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: John w. Roethe, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26781 - 2006-11-20
2007 WI APP 23
-Appellants-Cross-Respondents. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27725 - 2007-02-27
-Appellants-Cross-Respondents. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27725 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
WI APP 23
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: ROBERT J. WIRTZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27725 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: ROBERT J. WIRTZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
State v. Serena M.T.
Prejudicial Device?, 27 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 789, 790 n.10 (1993) (collecting cases). In this case, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13815 - 2005-03-31
Prejudicial Device?, 27 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 789, 790 n.10 (1993) (collecting cases). In this case, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests. The court found that while the officer saw “questionable driving” and glassy eyes, “[u]p
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123251 - 2017-09-21
sobriety tests. The court found that while the officer saw “questionable driving” and glassy eyes, “[u]p
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123251 - 2017-09-21