Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 12879 for se.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 12879 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Dontae L. Doyle, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion, which sought a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41860 - 2009-10-05
. Dontae L. Doyle, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion, which sought a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41860 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
language in Judge Carver’s order, George filed a pro se motion asking the court either to sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
language in Judge Carver’s order, George filed a pro se motion asking the court either to sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 49
of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of David C. Myers, pro se. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35568 - 2014-09-15
of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of David C. Myers, pro se. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35568 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark R. Norlander
adopted a per se rule that profile evidence is inadmissible.[4] Rather, whether profile evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
adopted a per se rule that profile evidence is inadmissible.[4] Rather, whether profile evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
Malaikham Bounpraseuth v. David Lewis
pro se. The matter was tried to the court on May 11, 2004, and July 27, 2004. Lewis sought equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21713 - 2017-09-21
pro se. The matter was tried to the court on May 11, 2004, and July 27, 2004. Lewis sought equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21713 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Norlander
a per se rule that profile evidence is inadmissible. 4 Rather, whether profile evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18379 - 2017-09-21
a per se rule that profile evidence is inadmissible. 4 Rather, whether profile evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18379 - 2017-09-21
Valley Bank v. David V. Jennings III
. Jennings III, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8337 - 2005-03-31
. Jennings III, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8337 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sheffield Groves, Sr., pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38806 - 2014-09-15
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sheffield Groves, Sr., pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38806 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
for public protection. Judge Sharpe viewed Mark’s numerous pro se correspondences with the court as evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141397 - 2015-05-12
for public protection. Judge Sharpe viewed Mark’s numerous pro se correspondences with the court as evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141397 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court a pro se letter requesting a speedy trial on July 22, 2020. The trial was not held until
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
the circuit court a pro se letter requesting a speedy trial on July 22, 2020. The trial was not held until
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20