Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2571 - 2580 of 46923 for shows.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and that it failed to do so. Baskerville attached to his motion jail booking records showing that he was in jail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245024 - 2019-08-08

[PDF] State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 232-36, 548 N.W.2d 69 (1996). To show prejudice, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2812 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kenny L. Warren
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06

[PDF] State v. Eric T. Scott
, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 804, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). Here, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
them from his grandfather. The circuit court replied that Derzay needed to show proof in the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350024 - 2021-03-30

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. We will not fully detail their testimony here. However, it shows there was an informal, perhaps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26848 - 2006-10-18

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
counsel must show both deficient performance and prejudice. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
counsel must show both deficient performance and prejudice. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15523 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edward C. Brandau
sentencing, he or she must show manifest injustice by clear and convincing evidence. State v. ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14796 - 2017-09-21