Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25701 - 25710 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 25701 - 25710 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Troy Dexter Wild
or violence existed, and that the sentence was an erroneous exercise of discretion. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13609 - 2015-04-23
or violence existed, and that the sentence was an erroneous exercise of discretion. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13609 - 2015-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
challenges the Commissioner’s decision on the following three bases: (1) Hammer claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52859 - 2014-09-15
challenges the Commissioner’s decision on the following three bases: (1) Hammer claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52859 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Department of Revenue v. Johnson Welding & Manufacturing Company, Inc.
with [the department] a claim for refund seeking recovery of the … Wisconsin sales tax it had charged and collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15989 - 2017-09-21
with [the department] a claim for refund seeking recovery of the … Wisconsin sales tax it had charged and collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15989 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward D. Anderson
claims. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7145 - 2008-09-02
claims. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7145 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Russell’s second Motion was based on his claim that “new information”—namely, an email from Cory’s doctor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048748 - 2025-12-10
. Russell’s second Motion was based on his claim that “new information”—namely, an email from Cory’s doctor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048748 - 2025-12-10
2006 WI APP 212
Wis. Stat. § 948.03(3)(b). Williams’s attorney objected, claiming submission of the lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26600 - 2006-10-30
Wis. Stat. § 948.03(3)(b). Williams’s attorney objected, claiming submission of the lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26600 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In this action Francis and Karen Groshek claim their former attorney, Michael G. Trewin, breached his fiduciary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35983 - 2014-09-15
. In this action Francis and Karen Groshek claim their former attorney, Michael G. Trewin, breached his fiduciary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35983 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and prosecute counter-claims related to the subject matter of the foreclosure complaint in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103151 - 2017-09-21
and prosecute counter-claims related to the subject matter of the foreclosure complaint in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 212
objected, claiming submission of the lesser- included offense was “unfair surprise” and “[t]here is no way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26600 - 2014-09-15
objected, claiming submission of the lesser- included offense was “unfair surprise” and “[t]here is no way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26600 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the bankruptcy stay.[2] The interim order allowed “borrowers” to “assert and prosecute counter-claims related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103151 - 2013-10-16
the bankruptcy stay.[2] The interim order allowed “borrowers” to “assert and prosecute counter-claims related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103151 - 2013-10-16