Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25701 - 25710 of 30191 for de.
Search results 25701 - 25710 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Enea v. Linn, 2002 WI App 185, ¶11, 256 Wis. 2d 714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140864 - 2015-04-27
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Enea v. Linn, 2002 WI App 185, ¶11, 256 Wis. 2d 714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140864 - 2015-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613119 - 2023-01-20
they are clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613119 - 2023-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The validity of a waiver is a question of law that we review de novo, see Ward, 318 Wis. 2d 301, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564329 - 2022-09-09
The validity of a waiver is a question of law that we review de novo, see Ward, 318 Wis. 2d 301, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564329 - 2022-09-09
[PDF]
WI APP 250
of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27071 - 2014-09-15
of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27071 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
review de novo. Rock Lake Estates Unit Owners Ass’n v. Township of Lake Mills, 195 Wis. 2d 348, 355, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30987 - 2007-12-18
review de novo. Rock Lake Estates Unit Owners Ass’n v. Township of Lake Mills, 195 Wis. 2d 348, 355, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30987 - 2007-12-18
Anthony Kish v. Health Personnel Options Corporation
; “[w]hether facts fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13001 - 2005-03-31
; “[w]hether facts fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13001 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a constitutional error is harmless is subject to de novo review. See State v. Rockette, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
Whether a constitutional error is harmless is subject to de novo review. See State v. Rockette, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶46, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772 N.W.2d 677. Again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806882 - 2024-05-29
review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶46, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772 N.W.2d 677. Again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806882 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Mootness is an issue that we review de novo. L.X.D.-O., 407 Wis. 2d 441, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696160 - 2023-08-29
. Mootness is an issue that we review de novo. L.X.D.-O., 407 Wis. 2d 441, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696160 - 2023-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard of review is de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, No. 2020AP1081-CR 8 ¶9, 291
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15
standard of review is de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, No. 2020AP1081-CR 8 ¶9, 291
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15