Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25701 - 25710 of 63389 for records.
Search results 25701 - 25710 of 63389 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Louis R.
, as relevant here, the following factors: the “personality and prior record of the juvenile”; the “type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13250 - 2017-09-21
, as relevant here, the following factors: the “personality and prior record of the juvenile”; the “type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205696 - 2017-12-12
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205696 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the no- merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156164 - 2017-09-21
has not done so. Upon consideration of the no- merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
the record because they are only words and so I think it is important for me to put that into the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15
the record because they are only words and so I think it is important for me to put that into the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15
State v. Gary E. Waters
little prejudicial effect. They were not inflammatory or inherently prejudicial. The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5753 - 2005-03-31
little prejudicial effect. They were not inflammatory or inherently prejudicial. The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5753 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1907-CRNM 2 response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266828 - 2020-07-07
. No. 2018AP1907-CRNM 2 response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266828 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the circuit court. Furthermore, she does not point this court to that portion of the circuit court record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601795 - 2022-12-21
in the circuit court. Furthermore, she does not point this court to that portion of the circuit court record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601795 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289242 - 2020-09-23
report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289242 - 2020-09-23
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.17(1) (2009-10).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91323 - 2013-01-08
. Stat. Rule 809.17(1) (2009-10).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91323 - 2013-01-08