Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25711 - 25720 of 29740 for des.
Search results 25711 - 25720 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
Michael J. Hager v. Gary Marten
frame resulted in a jurisdictional defect. In a habeas corpus action, we apply a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17341 - 2017-09-21
frame resulted in a jurisdictional defect. In a habeas corpus action, we apply a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17341 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; however, we review the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286140 - 2020-09-10
; however, we review the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286140 - 2020-09-10
[PDF]
WI APP 70
provision in WIS. STAT. § 704.17(2)(b). The circuit court agreed. Our review of this legal issue is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113099 - 2017-09-21
provision in WIS. STAT. § 704.17(2)(b). The circuit court agreed. Our review of this legal issue is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
own personal benefit.” ¶11 The court commissioner denied Fieschko’s motion. Fieschko sought de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231434 - 2018-12-28
own personal benefit.” ¶11 The court commissioner denied Fieschko’s motion. Fieschko sought de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231434 - 2018-12-28
[PDF]
Clarence C. Joseph v. Gary R. McCaughtry
is not a de novo inquiry. Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis.2d 57, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20 (1978). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12273 - 2017-09-21
is not a de novo inquiry. Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis.2d 57, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20 (1978). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12273 - 2017-09-21
Larry Buyatt v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
interpretation of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6905 - 2005-03-31
interpretation of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
Clarence C. Joseph v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. Review by certiorari is not a de novo inquiry. Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis.2d 57, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12273 - 2005-03-31
. Review by certiorari is not a de novo inquiry. Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis.2d 57, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 13
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hamdan, 2003 WI 113, ¶19, 264 Wis. 2d 433, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253382 - 2020-04-27
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hamdan, 2003 WI 113, ¶19, 264 Wis. 2d 433, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253382 - 2020-04-27