Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25721 - 25730 of 29739 for des.
Search results 25721 - 25730 of 29739 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶34 Based on the testimony presented at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113164 - 2014-05-28
of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶34 Based on the testimony presented at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113164 - 2014-05-28
Irene Blumer v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
with federal law. Accordingly, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review is de novo. Overview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15414 - 2005-03-31
with federal law. Accordingly, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review is de novo. Overview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15414 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Our review of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34782 - 2008-12-03
. Our review of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34782 - 2008-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16000 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16000 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Broome v. DOC, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171158 - 2017-09-21
on summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Broome v. DOC, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a reviewing court. .... We apply de novo review when “there is no evidence that the agency has any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107103 - 2017-09-21
a reviewing court. .... We apply de novo review when “there is no evidence that the agency has any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Albert J. Price, Jr.
to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. at 719 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3319 - 2017-09-19
to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. at 719 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3319 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Amy B. Reardon v. David O. Braeger
ruling merits de novo review because it requires applying undisputed facts to a statute. In other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25508 - 2017-09-21
ruling merits de novo review because it requires applying undisputed facts to a statute. In other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is de novo, and we are not bound by the circuit court’s reasoning. Mrozek v. Intra Fin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649123 - 2023-04-27
judgment decision is de novo, and we are not bound by the circuit court’s reasoning. Mrozek v. Intra Fin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649123 - 2023-04-27