Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25721 - 25730 of 29810 for des.
Search results 25721 - 25730 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict in a criminal prosecution is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659795 - 2023-05-23
is sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict in a criminal prosecution is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659795 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
WI APP 187
of law to agreed-on facts de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 317, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29616 - 2014-09-15
of law to agreed-on facts de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 317, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29616 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
own personal benefit.” ¶11 The court commissioner denied Fieschko’s motion. Fieschko sought de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231434 - 2018-12-28
own personal benefit.” ¶11 The court commissioner denied Fieschko’s motion. Fieschko sought de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231434 - 2018-12-28
State v. Joseph Steffes
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11968 - 2005-03-31
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11968 - 2005-03-31
James L. Buzzell v. Karen J. Buzzell
, ¶10, __ Wis. 2d __, 634 N.W.2d 544. However, we review the court’s legal conclusions de novo. Ansani
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3469 - 2005-03-31
, ¶10, __ Wis. 2d __, 634 N.W.2d 544. However, we review the court’s legal conclusions de novo. Ansani
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3469 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id., ¶¶47-48. However, we do not undertake that review here because we consider First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88089 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id., ¶¶47-48. However, we do not undertake that review here because we consider First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88089 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613119 - 2023-01-20
they are clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613119 - 2023-01-20
[PDF]
John L. Senty v. James A. Senty
. Standards of Review A. Summary Judgment ¶21 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24628 - 2017-09-21
. Standards of Review A. Summary Judgment ¶21 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24628 - 2017-09-21