Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence modification motion.[1] The issues are whether Gilmore is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29779 - 2007-07-23
his sentence modification motion.[1] The issues are whether Gilmore is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29779 - 2007-07-23
CA Blank Order
the motion to dismiss of defendants Milwaukee County and several named employees (collectively, “the county
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91821 - 2013-01-22
the motion to dismiss of defendants Milwaukee County and several named employees (collectively, “the county
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91821 - 2013-01-22
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
, Defendant-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 223 Wis. 2d 331, 588 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17236 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 223 Wis. 2d 331, 588 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2010AP2822-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71359 - 2014-09-15
his postconviction motion brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2010AP2822-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71359 - 2014-09-15
State v. James A. Albright
, as evidenced by the videotape played at the motion hearing, do not constitute probable cause to arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31
, as evidenced by the videotape played at the motion hearing, do not constitute probable cause to arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Daniel D. King, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
CURIAM. Daniel D. King, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Edwards
(OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
(OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
, Defendant-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 223 Wis. 2d 331, 588 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 223 Wis. 2d 331, 588 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
S. Eisenberg v. Robert Babikan
are whether the trial judge properly denied Eisenberg’s motion to disqualify him from serving No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4262 - 2017-09-19
are whether the trial judge properly denied Eisenberg’s motion to disqualify him from serving No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4262 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. In 2018, 2019, and 2020, Helgeland filed three pro se motions related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851232 - 2024-09-18
years of extended supervision. In 2018, 2019, and 2020, Helgeland filed three pro se motions related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851232 - 2024-09-18