Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 57708 for id.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 57708 for id.
[PDF]
Sara M. Sandberg v. John P. Donahue
ministerial duty.” Id., ¶¶20-25. ¶3 Donahue’s argument fails because Findorff is not a divorce case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25625 - 2017-09-21
ministerial duty.” Id., ¶¶20-25. ¶3 Donahue’s argument fails because Findorff is not a divorce case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
they entered” the premises to be searched. Id. A “magistrate” had refused to issue a “no-knock” warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9365 - 2017-09-19
they entered” the premises to be searched. Id. A “magistrate” had refused to issue a “no-knock” warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
must set forth specific evidentiary facts showing that a genuine issue exists for trial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28390 - 2014-09-15
must set forth specific evidentiary facts showing that a genuine issue exists for trial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28390 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Pett
under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2) because the State did not file a Whitty motion. See id. at 292-97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2) because the State did not file a Whitty motion. See id. at 292-97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Montreavous L. Gray
, id. at 583-84, and the reason must be supported by evidence in the record, State v. Shanks, 152 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7267 - 2017-09-20
, id. at 583-84, and the reason must be supported by evidence in the record, State v. Shanks, 152 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7267 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
] personally whether a factual basis exists to support the plea.” Id., 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d at 617
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
] personally whether a factual basis exists to support the plea.” Id., 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d at 617
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Deficient performance and prejudice are both mixed questions of fact and law. Id., ¶18. “We uphold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08
). Deficient performance and prejudice are both mixed questions of fact and law. Id., ¶18. “We uphold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08
Nicole R. Walton v. The Home Indemnity Corporation
, 916 (Ct. App. 1987). We decide the question of ambiguity without deference to the trial court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9177 - 2005-03-31
, 916 (Ct. App. 1987). We decide the question of ambiguity without deference to the trial court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9177 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
expenditure paid out because of the crime.” Id. (quotations omitted). ¶15 The determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29
expenditure paid out because of the crime.” Id. (quotations omitted). ¶15 The determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the defendant entered a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. Id., ¶31. Here, the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875287 - 2024-11-12
that the defendant entered a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. Id., ¶31. Here, the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875287 - 2024-11-12