Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 57351 for id.

State v. Jeffrey L. Leggions
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
will not disturb the Board’s findings if any reasonable view of the evidence sustains them. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15

Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. v. Jerome B. Mueller
methodology as the trial court in deciding whether summary judgment is appropriate. Id. at 314, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9105 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Savinski
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11524 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bobby R. Williams
. First, the defendant may move to withdraw his plea. Id. The initial burden is on the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19729 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John A. P. v. Family Service of Waukesha
in a particular subject matter. See id. at 923, 440 N.W.2d at 552. The common interest privilege exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances to determine whether a defendant has agreed to the factual basis underlying the plea. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132115 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jim Sielaff v. Matco Tools Corporation
reveals that the circuit court was “clearly wrong.” Id. at 388-89 (citations omitted). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14742 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of parental rights is in the child’s best interests. Id., ¶27; see also State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625286 - 2023-02-23

[PDF] NOTICE
… prior cases also indicate that the actual effects of a defendant’s conduct are probative.” Id., ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55391 - 2014-09-15