Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 59324 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 59324 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo D. Handal
of counsel claim, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2763 - 2017-09-19
of counsel claim, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2763 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy J. Lee
possessing marijuana contrary to §§ 161.14(4)(t) and 161.01(14), Stats. Lee claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-04-22
possessing marijuana contrary to §§ 161.14(4)(t) and 161.01(14), Stats. Lee claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-04-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
claimed the bulk of the responsibility for the prank. The Commission amended its findings but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35879 - 2014-09-15
claimed the bulk of the responsibility for the prank. The Commission amended its findings but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35879 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, asserting that an order dismissing its claims without prejudice is not final under Wis. Stat. § 808.03(1).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
, asserting that an order dismissing its claims without prejudice is not final under Wis. Stat. § 808.03(1).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance claim, we will not address them. Zittlow alternatively appears to seek resentencing based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188815 - 2017-09-21
assistance claim, we will not address them. Zittlow alternatively appears to seek resentencing based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and required the court to set a parole eligibility date, this claim does not assert a new factor but instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30
and required the court to set a parole eligibility date, this claim does not assert a new factor but instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals, and writs. We have repeatedly denied his claims. See Harris v. State (Harris I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191269 - 2017-09-21
, appeals, and writs. We have repeatedly denied his claims. See Harris v. State (Harris I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial counsel rendered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
. Nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial counsel rendered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
John W. Gibson v.
of nonlawyer assistants, SCR 20:5.3 (b) and (c).[5] In addition, his advancement of non-meritorious claims
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17261 - 2012-05-07
of nonlawyer assistants, SCR 20:5.3 (b) and (c).[5] In addition, his advancement of non-meritorious claims
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17261 - 2012-05-07
CA Blank Order
, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). There is no arguable merit to a claim that there was no factual basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131327 - 2005-04-08
, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). There is no arguable merit to a claim that there was no factual basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131327 - 2005-04-08