Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 58950 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 58950 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Winius claimed that although the court stressed Winius’s need for treatment, he had been unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74538 - 2014-09-15
. Winius claimed that although the court stressed Winius’s need for treatment, he had been unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74538 - 2014-09-15
State v. Craig L. Miller
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3347 - 2005-03-31
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald E. Stoetzel v. City of New Berlin
it to clarify Stoetzel's claims and provide us with an understanding of them. At trial, Stoetzel was asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8476 - 2017-09-19
it to clarify Stoetzel's claims and provide us with an understanding of them. At trial, Stoetzel was asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8476 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 In his postconviction motion, Neumann claimed that he had been sentenced based upon inaccurate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667652 - 2023-06-13
1 In his postconviction motion, Neumann claimed that he had been sentenced based upon inaccurate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667652 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to suppress his statements made to law enforcement at a hospital, claiming he was not given his Miranda3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791217 - 2024-04-23
to suppress his statements made to law enforcement at a hospital, claiming he was not given his Miranda3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791217 - 2024-04-23
CA Blank Order
.2d 334. A Rothering motion must allege with particularity how and why his current claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129301 - 2014-11-16
.2d 334. A Rothering motion must allege with particularity how and why his current claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129301 - 2014-11-16
State v. Jovan T. Mull
that Mull is procedurally barred from raising ineffective assistance and severance claims at this juncture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31
that Mull is procedurally barred from raising ineffective assistance and severance claims at this juncture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“incommunicado” unless he discharged counsel, as he now claims. In sum, Henderson’s choice was whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166050 - 2017-09-21
“incommunicado” unless he discharged counsel, as he now claims. In sum, Henderson’s choice was whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that Rizvi did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220570 - 2018-10-03
merit to a claim that Rizvi did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220570 - 2018-10-03
State v. Derrick Sandles
Sandles moved for sentence modification, claiming that the trial court’s misinterpretation of the concepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2006-02-06
Sandles moved for sentence modification, claiming that the trial court’s misinterpretation of the concepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2006-02-06