Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25731 - 25740 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and required the court to set a parole eligibility date, this claim does not assert a new factor but instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30
and required the court to set a parole eligibility date, this claim does not assert a new factor but instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance claim, we will not address them. Zittlow alternatively appears to seek resentencing based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188815 - 2017-09-21
assistance claim, we will not address them. Zittlow alternatively appears to seek resentencing based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas G. Smith v. Firstar Bank Eau Claire, N.A.
a judgment dismissing his complaint against Firstar Bank Eau Claire, N.A. Smith claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15147 - 2017-09-21
a judgment dismissing his complaint against Firstar Bank Eau Claire, N.A. Smith claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15147 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie C. Fondren
ineffective assistance of counsel. A defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel so substandard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3948 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of counsel. A defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel so substandard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeanne M. Kline v. Kenneth J. Kline
maintenance to Jeanne. Despite Kenneth's claim that the amount is excessive because it exceeds Jeanne's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8105 - 2017-09-19
maintenance to Jeanne. Despite Kenneth's claim that the amount is excessive because it exceeds Jeanne's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8105 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles V. Royster
) and 939.62 (2003-04).[2] Royster requests only that the order be vacated and he be resentenced. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
) and 939.62 (2003-04).[2] Royster requests only that the order be vacated and he be resentenced. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
State v. Ricky McMorris
hearing on his claim that the prosecutor intentionally caused a mistrial by presenting Charles to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
hearing on his claim that the prosecutor intentionally caused a mistrial by presenting Charles to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5389 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5389 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He claims the evidence presented at the commitment hearing was insufficient to support the orders.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55722 - 2010-10-18
. He claims the evidence presented at the commitment hearing was insufficient to support the orders.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55722 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
results was a reasonable strategic decision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶11 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29
results was a reasonable strategic decision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶11 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29