Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25741 - 25750 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 25741 - 25750 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Rodney C. Burkins
He claims that the arresting officer failed to give him notice of the consequences of his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9406 - 2017-09-19
He claims that the arresting officer failed to give him notice of the consequences of his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9406 - 2017-09-19
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5766 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rule Order
of a Pilot Project for Dedicated Trial Court Judicial Dockets for Large Claim Business and Commercial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816925 - 2024-06-18
of a Pilot Project for Dedicated Trial Court Judicial Dockets for Large Claim Business and Commercial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816925 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
Stratford Area Fire Department v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that Krause’s claim for loss of earning capacity benefits was premature because, although Krause sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2475 - 2017-09-19
that Krause’s claim for loss of earning capacity benefits was premature because, although Krause sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2475 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
. Id. Litigants claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9605 - 2005-03-31
. Id. Litigants claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9605 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
Naomi Anderson v. Con/Spec Corporation
. Con/Spec and BE Architects both claim the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11651 - 2005-03-31
. Con/Spec and BE Architects both claim the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11651 - 2005-03-31
State v. Herschel Knighton
without Knighton’s consent. To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4910 - 2005-03-31
without Knighton’s consent. To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4910 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
no-merit report, Serra claims that he is entitled to sentence credit. The circuit court has never made any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108099 - 2014-02-11
no-merit report, Serra claims that he is entitled to sentence credit. The circuit court has never made any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108099 - 2014-02-11
State v. Derrick Stewart
motion, Stewart claimed that the prosecution had unconstitutionally withheld exculpatory evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11970 - 2005-03-31
motion, Stewart claimed that the prosecution had unconstitutionally withheld exculpatory evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11970 - 2005-03-31