Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25741 - 25750 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25741 - 25750 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672171 - 2023-06-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672171 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2015 WI 112 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1340-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158270 - 2017-09-21
2015 WI 112 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1340-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case with third-offense OWI. He moved to collaterally attack his 2006 second-offense OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314384 - 2020-12-15
case with third-offense OWI. He moved to collaterally attack his 2006 second-offense OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314384 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
argument and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In two Marathon County circuit court cases, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34815 - 2014-09-15
argument and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In two Marathon County circuit court cases, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34815 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
We provide only a summary of this case’s long history. The Meises filed a request in circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
We provide only a summary of this case’s long history. The Meises filed a request in circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
the facts in each of these cases very briefly. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, the defendant does stipulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2788 - 2005-03-31
the facts in each of these cases very briefly. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, the defendant does stipulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it removed a sentence credit awarded in his case. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153920 - 2017-09-21
erred when it removed a sentence credit awarded in his case. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cases [that] have addressed the situation in which an officer relied upon his or her sense of smell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138608 - 2017-09-21
cases [that] have addressed the situation in which an officer relied upon his or her sense of smell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138608 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117322 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723485 - 2023-11-08
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723485 - 2023-11-08