Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25741 - 25750 of 29823 for des.
Search results 25741 - 25750 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260629 - 2020-05-19
that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260629 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
WI APP 4
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
. § 805.17(2). We review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178 Wis. 2d at 148. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
. § 805.17(2). We review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178 Wis. 2d at 148. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. A. Summary Judgment ¶15 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79061 - 2012-03-05
. A. Summary Judgment ¶15 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79061 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The validity of a waiver is a question of law that we review de novo, see Ward, 318 Wis. 2d 301, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564329 - 2022-09-09
The validity of a waiver is a question of law that we review de novo, see Ward, 318 Wis. 2d 301, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564329 - 2022-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Carl R. Kramer
the circuit court applied the correct legal standard, however, is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17554 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court applied the correct legal standard, however, is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17554 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117, 310 N.W.2d 789 (1981
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117, 310 N.W.2d 789 (1981
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo.” Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶12, 291 Wis. 2d 333, 718 N.W.2d 38. ¶34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29381 - 2007-06-13
, which we review de novo.” Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶12, 291 Wis. 2d 333, 718 N.W.2d 38. ¶34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29381 - 2007-06-13
[PDF]
Michael J. Hager v. Gary Marten
frame resulted in a jurisdictional defect. In a habeas corpus action, we apply a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17341 - 2017-09-21
frame resulted in a jurisdictional defect. In a habeas corpus action, we apply a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17341 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01