Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25751 - 25760 of 29838 for des.
Search results 25751 - 25760 of 29838 for des.
[PDF]
Donna Walag v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
: “great weight,” “due weight” or “de novo.” The great weight standard is the highest degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3437 - 2017-09-19
: “great weight,” “due weight” or “de novo.” The great weight standard is the highest degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3437 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8413 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8413 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 2
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143629 - 2017-09-21
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). The ultimate determination of whether counsel was ineffective is a question we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228649 - 2018-11-28
omitted). The ultimate determination of whether counsel was ineffective is a question we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228649 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard for awarding attorney fees under § 19.37(2)(a) de novo. See Anderson v. MSI Preferred Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27160 - 2014-09-15
standard for awarding attorney fees under § 19.37(2)(a) de novo. See Anderson v. MSI Preferred Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27160 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 250
of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27071 - 2014-09-15
of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27071 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ralph E. Adams
involving the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12710 - 2017-09-21
involving the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Angel Luis Rodriguez
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶14 Having examined the trial transcript, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3143 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶14 Having examined the trial transcript, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3143 - 2017-09-19