Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 83344 for case search.

[PDF] Kathleen M. Schmitt v. Arnold C. Schmitt
2001 WI App 78 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-0695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2384 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 192
2007 WI APP 192 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1566
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29801 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. George S. Tulley
2001 WI App 236 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3084-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3264 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16322 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
2019 WI 107 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP540-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251534 - 2019-12-18

State v. Julie Ann Quinn
, that she thought her labor pains were simply a case of food poisoning, and that she thought the delivery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kywanda F.
and warrants reversal only if the juvenile suffers actual prejudice. Because the factual record in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16923 - 2008-05-27

[PDF] Randall Schwartz v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2002 WI App 255 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4926 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
materials do not rebut Veritas’s prima facie case. ¶2 On de novo review, we conclude that Veritas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737692 - 2023-12-12

Frontsheet
2011 WI 22 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 09AP118 Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63221 - 2005-03-31