Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 29985 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sveum
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Mata, 199 Wis.2d 315, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12804 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Mata, 199 Wis.2d 315, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The Town’s Summary Judgment Arguments ¶15 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34785 - 2014-09-15
. The Town’s Summary Judgment Arguments ¶15 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William Jungbauer v. Polk County
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2789 - 2017-09-19
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2789 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 167
review de novo). No. 2009AP2583 6 Plain Language Analysis ¶13 The purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56671 - 2014-09-15
review de novo). No. 2009AP2583 6 Plain Language Analysis ¶13 The purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
this judgment. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burkes v. Klauser, 185 Wis.2d 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7762 - 2017-09-19
this judgment. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burkes v. Klauser, 185 Wis.2d 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7762 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133438 - 2015-01-21
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133438 - 2015-01-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id., ¶13. However, we review de novo whether the assessments were adequately conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180891 - 2017-09-21
erroneous. Id., ¶13. However, we review de novo whether the assessments were adequately conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. De Zonia, 63 Wis. 2d 429, 432, 217 N.W.2d 377 (1974). Secors contends Claim VIII is a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346310 - 2021-03-16
. De Zonia, 63 Wis. 2d 429, 432, 217 N.W.2d 377 (1974). Secors contends Claim VIII is a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346310 - 2021-03-16
WI App 84 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP679 Complete Title of ...
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118462 - 2014-08-26
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118462 - 2014-08-26
State v. Carl R. Kramer
applied the correct legal standard, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. McCollum, 159
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17554 - 2005-03-31
applied the correct legal standard, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. McCollum, 159
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17554 - 2005-03-31