Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 29735 for des.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 29735 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the certification decision … comports with [WIS. STAT. § 803.08(11)] is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677112 - 2023-07-11
the certification decision … comports with [WIS. STAT. § 803.08(11)] is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677112 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the preliminary hearing was used as a de facto evidence deposition for the State, which was improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56204 - 2014-09-15
, the preliminary hearing was used as a de facto evidence deposition for the State, which was improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the time it took Officer Sardina to ask the CCW question as de minimis and virtually incapable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239975 - 2019-04-30
the time it took Officer Sardina to ask the CCW question as de minimis and virtually incapable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239975 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100496 - 2017-09-21
. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100496 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 78
in the complaint[]. These are questions of law we review de novo. Marks v. Houston Cas. Co., 2015 WI App 44, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148908 - 2017-09-21
in the complaint[]. These are questions of law we review de novo. Marks v. Houston Cas. Co., 2015 WI App 44, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148908 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 40
, the interpretation and application of § 236.45(2) to these facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31950 - 2008-03-18
, the interpretation and application of § 236.45(2) to these facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31950 - 2008-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law we review de novo. Id. “Counsel’s conduct is constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30
a question of law we review de novo. Id. “Counsel’s conduct is constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30
2006 WI APP 261
; we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27184 - 2006-12-19
; we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27184 - 2006-12-19
State v. Joseph Steffes
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31