Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25771 - 25780 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 25771 - 25780 of 33989 for dismissal.
State v. Mario M. Martinez
were dismissed but “read-in” and considered for purposes of sentencing. ¶3 The sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31
were dismissed but “read-in” and considered for purposes of sentencing. ¶3 The sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31
Eau Claire County v. Robert P.
psychiatric evaluations. Robert filed a motion to dismiss based upon corporation counsel’s failure to serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31
psychiatric evaluations. Robert filed a motion to dismiss based upon corporation counsel’s failure to serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on this issue, but the parties have since voluntarily dismissed the cross-appeal. ¶8 Around the same time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29202 - 2014-09-15
on this issue, but the parties have since voluntarily dismissed the cross-appeal. ¶8 Around the same time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
count of battery as a party to the crime; all other counts were dismissed but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48538 - 2014-09-15
count of battery as a party to the crime; all other counts were dismissed but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48538 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreed to plead to the amended charge, in exchange for the State’s dismissal of three other counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143231 - 2017-09-21
agreed to plead to the amended charge, in exchange for the State’s dismissal of three other counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143231 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David R. Nott
pursue a client's case and failing to inform the client of the result and dismissal of his case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16653 - 2017-09-21
pursue a client's case and failing to inform the client of the result and dismissal of his case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16653 - 2017-09-21
Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
be dismissed as untimely because it was not filed within 45 days of the notice of order. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3030 - 2005-03-31
be dismissed as untimely because it was not filed within 45 days of the notice of order. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively, the Landowners) appeal an order No. 2010AP342 2 dismissing their WIS. STAT. § 32.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63631 - 2014-09-15
(collectively, the Landowners) appeal an order No. 2010AP342 2 dismissing their WIS. STAT. § 32.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
dismissed and read in. The State agreed to recommend an unspecified prison sentence. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14
dismissed and read in. The State agreed to recommend an unspecified prison sentence. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14
State v. Linda B.-S.
and hallucinate that God and the Devil talked to her. CHIPS petitions were dismissed when Linda agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
and hallucinate that God and the Devil talked to her. CHIPS petitions were dismissed when Linda agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31