Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25771 - 25780 of 69007 for had.

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
-month retention period had expired. In May 2010, Weissinger was charged with offenses based
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=623&year=2014

[PDF] Marlene Brown v. David G. Dibbell, M.D.
that the circuit court had erred and remanded the cause for a new trial. ¶2 Marlene Brown and her husband, Kurt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17289 - 2017-09-21

Sid Grinker Company, Inc. v. Rudy Treml
the property, but had his employee, Mary Stephanek, attend to addressing immediate repairs. Stephanek signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5115 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in the courtroom for the plea and sentencing hearing, although she had the right to be present. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925313 - 2025-03-11

[PDF] State v. William H. Roberts
that Roberts had testified to his four prior OWI convictions when that evidence was offered by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4091 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
not verify the vehicle was in fact the same vehicle he had seen earlier in the evening,” when he ran
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95462 - 2014-09-15

State v. Archie F. Gill
, 761 (Ct. App. 1997). Even if counsel had sought an evidentiary hearing, the motion to suppress would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12325 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
terrified. Theresa’s mother testified that she and her daughter spoke daily. Theresa had complained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
requested attorney’s fees. Cliff did not dispute that he had failed to comply with the divorce judgment.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53527 - 2010-08-18

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
for a conditional use permit, proceeding on the basis that the property had not been rezoned and was therefore zoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26911 - 2006-10-25