Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25771 - 25780 of 57351 for id.
Search results 25771 - 25780 of 57351 for id.
CA Blank Order
or rule creates “a significant risk of prolonging [the inmate’s] incarceration.”[2] Id. at 251
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
or rule creates “a significant risk of prolonging [the inmate’s] incarceration.”[2] Id. at 251
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no right to act contrary to the defendant’s expressed wishes [with respect to entering an NGI plea].” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168203 - 2017-09-21
no right to act contrary to the defendant’s expressed wishes [with respect to entering an NGI plea].” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168203 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
one. Id. at 697. Appellate review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773649 - 2024-03-12
one. Id. at 697. Appellate review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773649 - 2024-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Jason M. Mulroy
, this court is limited to determining whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6757 - 2017-09-20
, this court is limited to determining whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6757 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
. Id. at 250, 249 N.W.2d at 288. The court suggested the following sentencing procedure: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
. Id. at 250, 249 N.W.2d at 288. The court suggested the following sentencing procedure: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s comments for each defendant. See id. ¶3 Initially, we note that Goodman and Staten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
the circuit court’s comments for each defendant. See id. ¶3 Initially, we note that Goodman and Staten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Conners
in a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” See id. at 355 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20799 - 2017-09-21
in a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” See id. at 355 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances to determine whether a defendant has agreed to the factual basis underlying the plea. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132115 - 2017-09-21
of the circumstances to determine whether a defendant has agreed to the factual basis underlying the plea. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132115 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ruth M. Erickson v. Alvin Zimmerman
, sufficient to effect that change.” Id. at 157, 399 N.W.2d at 916. It is not necessary for an insured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13872 - 2014-09-15
, sufficient to effect that change.” Id. at 157, 399 N.W.2d at 916. It is not necessary for an insured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13872 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Id. To prove prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Id. To prove prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21