Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25781 - 25790 of 33982 for dismissed.
Search results 25781 - 25790 of 33982 for dismissed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be dismissed outright. Ambrose indicated that he would like to enter a no contest plea; however, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
to be dismissed outright. Ambrose indicated that he would like to enter a no contest plea; however, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche
counts would be dismissed and read in for restitution and/or sentencing purposes. After LaRoche’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12765 - 2005-03-31
counts would be dismissed and read in for restitution and/or sentencing purposes. After LaRoche’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
travelled to Chicago to obtain the cocaine. King moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137813 - 2017-09-21
travelled to Chicago to obtain the cocaine. King moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137813 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher Butler
, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler was ultimately convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2973 - 2005-03-31
, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler was ultimately convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2973 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
moved to dismiss the complaint, alleging the State violated his due process rights by delaying charging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
moved to dismiss the complaint, alleging the State violated his due process rights by delaying charging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
State v. Christopher Butler
, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler was ultimately convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2974 - 2005-03-31
, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler was ultimately convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
indicated that Hurt would be pleading guilty to the five offenses and the State would dismiss all penalty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249603 - 2019-10-31
indicated that Hurt would be pleading guilty to the five offenses and the State would dismiss all penalty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249603 - 2019-10-31
Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
therefore, the order is affirmed in whole and the appeal is hereby dismissed effective the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15581 - 2005-03-31
therefore, the order is affirmed in whole and the appeal is hereby dismissed effective the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15581 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
purpose in this prosecution, and that a dismissal of the charge with prejudice would be required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117675 - 2014-07-22
purpose in this prosecution, and that a dismissal of the charge with prejudice would be required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117675 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordinance and moved to dismiss the charge on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94653 - 2014-09-15
ordinance and moved to dismiss the charge on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94653 - 2014-09-15