Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25781 - 25790 of 57351 for id.
Search results 25781 - 25790 of 57351 for id.
State v. Montreavous L. Gray
). The burden is on the defendant to offer a fair and just reason, id. at 583-84, and the reason must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7267 - 2005-03-31
). The burden is on the defendant to offer a fair and just reason, id. at 583-84, and the reason must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7267 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 64
as a seventeen-year-old. Id. at 560. Although these cases do not suggest that a sentence of life without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35690 - 2014-09-15
as a seventeen-year-old. Id. at 560. Although these cases do not suggest that a sentence of life without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35690 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
that would challenge earlier findings made in the CHIPS dispositional order. Id. at 357-58. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
that would challenge earlier findings made in the CHIPS dispositional order. Id. at 357-58. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case.” Id. “[T]he defendant must show ‘good cause’ to warrant substitution of counsel.” Id. at 360
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324502 - 2021-01-20
of the case.” Id. “[T]he defendant must show ‘good cause’ to warrant substitution of counsel.” Id. at 360
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324502 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to comply with the procedural requirements of the new rule. Id., ¶53. The court rejected the notion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31680 - 2014-09-15
to comply with the procedural requirements of the new rule. Id., ¶53. The court rejected the notion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31680 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nevada Jerome
in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 When a defendant is convicted of more than one offense, the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5900 - 2017-09-19
in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 When a defendant is convicted of more than one offense, the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5900 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
,” at minimum, the court must have a personal dialogue with the defendant. Id., ¶3. ¶8 Krivoshein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
,” at minimum, the court must have a personal dialogue with the defendant. Id., ¶3. ¶8 Krivoshein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
WI App 101 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2178-CR Complete Titl...
independently whether the facts satisfied the constitutional standard. Id. ¶8 The Wisconsin and United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121796 - 2014-10-28
independently whether the facts satisfied the constitutional standard. Id. ¶8 The Wisconsin and United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121796 - 2014-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Stank
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19