Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25791 - 25800 of 29828 for des.

State v. Angel Luis Rodriguez
the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶14 Having examined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3143 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2009 WI 26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213414 - 2018-07-18

[PDF] Debra L. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d Nos. 03-2177 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6768 - 2017-09-20

State v. Mark T. Smith
of his right to present a defense is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Id., ¶69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31

Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11359 - 2005-03-31

Lenticular Europe, LLC v. William T. Cunnally
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31

Nancy Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.
judgments de novo, using the same method as the circuit court. Alvarado v. Sersch, 2003 WI 55, ¶10, 262 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16685 - 2005-03-31

Michael E. McMorrow v. State Superintendent of Public Instruction
” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de novo” review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15526 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark R. Johnson
of a statute and application to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19351 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, “which is a question of law we review de novo.” Id., ¶15. ¶21 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.415(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289138 - 2020-09-22