Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25791 - 25800 of 33786 for dismissal.

[PDF] State v. Andres Godina
of §§ 946.41(1), 947.01, 940.19(1) and 946.49(1)(a), STATS.; five additional counts were dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Leonard J. LaRoche
to the misdemeanor counts 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the information; and the other counts would be dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12765 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
as a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and denied the motion because Wis. Stat. § 351.10 expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107879 - 2014-02-10

Frontsheet
as part of the successful completion of deferred prosecution agreements that resulted in the dismissal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112680 - 2014-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to five counts of possession of child pornography in exchange for the dismissal of five additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353412 - 2021-04-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Russell also alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to move to dismiss the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21

CA Blank Order
, and the continuing-CHIPS ground would be dismissed. Following a dispositional hearing, the circuit court terminated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111428 - 2014-04-29

COURT OF APPEALS
moved to dismiss the charge, arguing the statute is unconstitutionally vague. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14

Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
judgment before the plaintiffs-homeowners explained their claims. It argues that the dismissal prejudices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31

Stephen Gray v. Allstate Insurance Company
CURIAM. Stephen Gray appeals from a judgment dismissing his personal injury action against the Allstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2111 - 2005-03-31