Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25791 - 25800 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] Micro Colorgraphics, Inc. v. Robert and Nancy Unger
. 5 Our review of the record indicates that Northwoods also sought punitive damages when it added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8313 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] George Burnett v. Dawn Alt
A. Johnson, guardian ad litem for Cody Alt, and Burnett discussed the situation on the record and agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11738 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28

[PDF] Juanita Randall v. Wayne Felt
relating to the circumstances surrounding the establishment of the disputed accounts. The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4423 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert Junior Carr
, the defendant has the burden to “show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18142 - 2005-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresents the record. ¶20 For example, on the first page of his statement of facts, Felton claims all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17

COURT OF APPEALS
The following undisputed facts are taken from the record before the Town Board. In September 2004, the Ottmans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2010-02-17

[PDF] State v. Linda L. McCoy
“[t]old me I need to go get Linda.” The record does not contain any information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21

Robert A. Armbruster v. Douglas Fitzgerald
. After conferring with the parties off the record, the court summarized the case status.[2] The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3987 - 2005-03-31

County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record. State v. Jenkins, 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6198 - 2005-03-31