Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2581 - 2590 of 83161 for case code.
Search results 2581 - 2590 of 83161 for case code.
[PDF]
Lori A. Johnson v. City of Waukesha
to Johnson for municipal code violations on this property. The City also began proceedings to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3667 - 2017-09-19
to Johnson for municipal code violations on this property. The City also began proceedings to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3667 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brian Maus v. Corwin VanderArk
the case for rehearing because the witnesses or their statements should have been collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13076 - 2017-09-21
the case for rehearing because the witnesses or their statements should have been collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13076 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barry L. Ball v. Matthew Frank
was given no specificity as to the time and location of his alleged misconduct. Under WIS. ADMIN. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21513 - 2017-09-21
was given no specificity as to the time and location of his alleged misconduct. Under WIS. ADMIN. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21513 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711389 - 2023-10-05
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711389 - 2023-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on February 11, 2015, and filed the complaint in this case in small claims court on June 18, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176594 - 2017-09-21
on February 11, 2015, and filed the complaint in this case in small claims court on June 18, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176594 - 2017-09-21
Brian Maus v. Corwin VanderArk
of the charges, he appealed to the warden. On October 13, 1995, the warden remanded the case for rehearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13076 - 2005-03-31
of the charges, he appealed to the warden. On October 13, 1995, the warden remanded the case for rehearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the second question need not be considered.” Bar Code Res., 229 Wis. 2d at 292. ¶11 Two cases illustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596925 - 2022-12-06
, the second question need not be considered.” Bar Code Res., 229 Wis. 2d at 292. ¶11 Two cases illustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596925 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This case requires us to decide whether the City of Waukesha acted within the bounds of the law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
This case requires us to decide whether the City of Waukesha acted within the bounds of the law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0049-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0049-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: kathryn W. Foster, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.[1] This case requires us to decide whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28
: kathryn W. Foster, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.[1] This case requires us to decide whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28