Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2581 - 2590 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2581 - 2590 of 29713 for des.
John Bettendorf v. St. Croix County
] Standard of Review ¶7 We review the trial court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26294 - 2006-08-23
] Standard of Review ¶7 We review the trial court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26294 - 2006-08-23
[PDF]
State v. Richard G. B.
of a statute to a set of facts, a question of law is presented, and our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5258 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to a set of facts, a question of law is presented, and our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5258 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 54
judgment de novo, using the same methodology of the circuit court. Phillips v. Parmelee, 2013 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109697 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, using the same methodology of the circuit court. Phillips v. Parmelee, 2013 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109697 - 2017-09-21
State v. Barry A. Bullard
presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3339 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3339 - 2005-03-31
Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael J. Schultz v. Village of Stoddard
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24564 - 2017-09-21
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276. ¶10 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7277 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276. ¶10 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7277 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
) is a matter of statutory construction subject to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
) is a matter of statutory construction subject to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under the clearly erroneous standard, but this court reviews de novo No. 2015AP1487-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21
under the clearly erroneous standard, but this court reviews de novo No. 2015AP1487-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
while intoxicated. Bell then petitioned the circuit court for a de novo review of the charge for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
while intoxicated. Bell then petitioned the circuit court for a de novo review of the charge for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31