Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2581 - 2590 of 7627 for yes.
Search results 2581 - 2590 of 7627 for yes.
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
. THE COURT: Jamie was living with you and Nicole? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, she was. THE COURT: Until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6065 - 2017-09-19
. THE COURT: Jamie was living with you and Nicole? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, she was. THE COURT: Until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6065 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael Strutz
attorney. You discussed, I believe, that one element; is that correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
attorney. You discussed, I believe, that one element; is that correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ashley S.
. And the rule on consistent statement is adults, no, and as to children, probably yes.” Following many more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15729 - 2017-09-21
. And the rule on consistent statement is adults, no, and as to children, probably yes.” Following many more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15729 - 2017-09-21
State v. Antraun Jordan
, was Jordan loitering in a public place? I conclude that the answer to this question is yes. The ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8870 - 2005-03-31
, was Jordan loitering in a public place? I conclude that the answer to this question is yes. The ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8870 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Family Insurance an amount of $1,463.10? [Ryan]: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Okay. The Court’s going to set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
Family Insurance an amount of $1,463.10? [Ryan]: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Okay. The Court’s going to set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. THE COURT: You understand it? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. THE COURT: All right. How do you plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
. THE COURT: You understand it? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. THE COURT: All right. How do you plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
? [MICHELE]: Yes. .… [MICHELE]: I have never once said they could not take her. [MICHELE’S ATTORNEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36323 - 2009-04-29
? [MICHELE]: Yes. .… [MICHELE]: I have never once said they could not take her. [MICHELE’S ATTORNEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36323 - 2009-04-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
] were planning to take [M.M.C.], you said that they could still take her? [MICHELE]: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36323 - 2014-09-15
] were planning to take [M.M.C.], you said that they could still take her? [MICHELE]: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36323 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that if they found Muns guilty, they had to answer “yes” or “no” as to whether his BAC was 0.17 or above
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140852 - 2015-04-28
that if they found Muns guilty, they had to answer “yes” or “no” as to whether his BAC was 0.17 or above
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140852 - 2015-04-28
State v. Scott Elvers
?” Elvers responded, “Yes, sir.” Next, the trial court personally confirmed with Elvers that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19978 - 2005-10-18
?” Elvers responded, “Yes, sir.” Next, the trial court personally confirmed with Elvers that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19978 - 2005-10-18