Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25801 - 25810 of 34004 for dismissal.
Search results 25801 - 25810 of 34004 for dismissal.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” The circuit court denied the motion. Bell appealed, but he subsequently voluntarily dismissed his appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
.” The circuit court denied the motion. Bell appealed, but he subsequently voluntarily dismissed his appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was also charged with first-degree sexual assault of a child, but that count was later dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208065 - 2018-02-08
was also charged with first-degree sexual assault of a child, but that count was later dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208065 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss and read in the remaining counts. The State also agreed to recommend a total twenty-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165379 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss and read in the remaining counts. The State also agreed to recommend a total twenty-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165379 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
be dismissed, Niemczyk would plead to all of the remaining charges, and both sides would be free to argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
be dismissed, Niemczyk would plead to all of the remaining charges, and both sides would be free to argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Brian Doherty appeals a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Brian Doherty appeals a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
State v. Rickey V. Gray
. §§ 946.415(2), 946.41(1), 947.01, 940.19(1) and 940.20(2) (2001-02).[1] Before trial the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5459 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 946.415(2), 946.41(1), 947.01, 940.19(1) and 940.20(2) (2001-02).[1] Before trial the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089761 - 2026-03-12
was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089761 - 2026-03-12
State v. Michael G.
dismissal of the underlying CHIPS petition and the concurrent revocation of the authority of the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31
dismissal of the underlying CHIPS petition and the concurrent revocation of the authority of the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
alcohol concentration. ¶4 Erdmann moved to suppress the evidence and dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2005-03-31
alcohol concentration. ¶4 Erdmann moved to suppress the evidence and dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry George
that dismissal without prejudice was an available remedy for failure to bring a case for trial within 120 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6128 - 2017-09-19
that dismissal without prejudice was an available remedy for failure to bring a case for trial within 120 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6128 - 2017-09-19